 |
 |
 |
 |
How do you
encourage your colleagues to do what you want them to do? How do you influence their behavior? |
 |
 |
Partner-level stars are a
professional service firm’s scarcest and most
valuable resource. Success depends on the degree
to which the firm’s goals are these stars’ goals –
and vice versa. On the one hand, firms must manage
their partners. On the other hand, the idea of
“managing” partners is an oxymoron. They can be
influenced, but they cannot be
controlled. |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
There is no one-way to get your partners to “do what you want them to do.” Each firm and its people systems are unique. Your firm’s answers to the questions that it faces influence how people systems are developed. Some of the questions and issues that surface are:
- How do we influence
partner behavior?
- How do we decide whom to
promote to partner?
- How should we compensate
our stars?
- What should our performance review process be?
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Professional service firms
must guide their stars, not manage them.
Partner-level stars with the most impact lead from
within the partnership, rather than above it, even
if they hold formal leadership positions. Such
influence is derived almost wholly from personal
behavior: partners respond to other partners, more
because of their trust and confidence in them than
because they occupy specific roles. Individuals
exercise leadership less by virtue of formal
authority than because other powerful partners
willingly follow them.
|

 |
|
 |
 |
The strength of a firm’s partnership determines the future value of the firm. Partners define the internal and external strategic identity of the firm. It is essential that the right people be promoted to partner. |
 |
 |
While the specifics of promotion processes vary from firm to firm (and profession to profession), good processes share several characteristics.
- Explicit criteria and
standards
- A rigorous data-driven
process
- Partnership decisions are firm-wide, not individual or office decisions
|
 |
|
 |
 |
There are no universal best practices for compensation systems, but there are a few common denominators among the most effective.
- Everyone trusts the
decision-making process (and the
decision-makers) to be fair
- The system is designed
to encourage partners to take the long view and
focus on the firm’s strategic goals
- The firm is explicit and inventive about the measures they use to evaluate performance and determine partner compensation
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Professional service firms tend to have a good grasp of their junior stars’ skills and aspirations due to their senior stars’ involvement. However, this involvement falls off sharply once the stars have been promoted to partner level. |
 |
 |
Performance reviews provide an opportunity for the firm to influence its stars and vice versa. Whether this actually happens hinges a great deal on how the review process is conceived and managed. Good performance reviews begin by looking backward, at what’s been accomplished since the last review. But even when a senior star is underperforming, the balance of discussion will tip toward the future – to what can be accomplished and what ought to be done. |
 |
| |
 |